<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ai Capex on k4i.com</title>
    <link>https://k4i.com/tags/ai-capex/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ai Capex on k4i.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://k4i.com/tags/ai-capex/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>AI&#39;s $700B Capex vs the App-Layer Revenue Curve: The Bull Case for the Crossover</title>
      <link>https://k4i.com/ais-700b-capex-vs-the-app-layer-revenue-curve-the-bull-case-for-the-crossover/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://k4i.com/ais-700b-capex-vs-the-app-layer-revenue-curve-the-bull-case-for-the-crossover/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The dominant worry about the AI buildout is a timing mismatch: roughly $700 billion of hyperscaler capital expenditure committed in 2026, against application revenues that critics call nascent. The bear frames this as a financing problem waiting to happen. The bull case is narrower and more mechanical, and it is worth stating in its strongest form: the capex curve and the revenue curve are shaped to cross, and the crossover is arriving now rather than at the end of the decade.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
