<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Capex on k4i.com</title>
    <link>https://k4i.com/tags/capex/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Capex on k4i.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://k4i.com/tags/capex/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Micron Breaks Ground in Hiroshima: A Sound $9 Billion Bet That Arrives Exactly When the Bears Say the Glut Does</title>
      <link>https://k4i.com/micron-breaks-ground-in-hiroshima-a-sound-9-billion-bet-that-arrives-exactly-when-the-bears-say-the-glut-does/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://k4i.com/micron-breaks-ground-in-hiroshima-a-sound-9-billion-bet-that-arrives-exactly-when-the-bears-say-the-glut-does/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Micron broke ground this week on a roughly $9 billion HBM fab inside its existing Hiroshima campus, with first shipments targeted for the summer of 2028. Strip away the ribbon-cutting and the strategic logic is genuinely sound: HBM is the most constrained component in the AI supply chain, Micron is the number-three player trying to close the gap on SK Hynix and Samsung, and the Japanese government is covering a large slice of the bill. Every part of that is defensible. The problem isn&amp;rsquo;t the decision — it&amp;rsquo;s the arrival date. This capacity lands in 2028, which is precisely the year the supply-glut argument that drove this week&amp;rsquo;s memory selloff says the cycle rolls over. The same event is the bull&amp;rsquo;s bottleneck-reliever and the bear&amp;rsquo;s Exhibit A, and which one it becomes won&amp;rsquo;t be knowable for two years.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
