<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cxl on k4i.com</title>
    <link>https://k4i.com/tags/cxl/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Cxl on k4i.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://k4i.com/tags/cxl/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Marvell&#39;s Structera CXL Compresses Server Memory In Hardware At Line Rate, Halving Cost Per Gigabyte As DDR5 Shortages Intensify</title>
      <link>https://k4i.com/marvells-structera-cxl-compresses-server-memory-in-hardware-at-line-rate-halving-cost-per-gigabyte-as-ddr5-shortages-intensify/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://k4i.com/marvells-structera-cxl-compresses-server-memory-in-hardware-at-line-rate-halving-cost-per-gigabyte-as-ddr5-shortages-intensify/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;CXL was sold as a capacity story: extend the memory pool past the DIMM slots soldered to the motherboard. Marvell&amp;rsquo;s argument with Structera is sharper than that. The pool itself is half-empty. The data sitting in DRAM is compressible, almost no CXL controller touches it, and Structera does — in dedicated silicon, at line rate, invisible to the host.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The number circulating is 3.64x, the top of the range Marvell cites for mixed real-world data types, which it claims match or closely approach what host-side LZ4 achieves in software. Field reporting has been more conservative; ServeTheHome quoted Marvell putting practical ratios at 1.8x to 2x. Both numbers point the same way. Even a flat 2:1 halves the effective cost per gigabyte of a memory pool, and memory is the single largest line item in that pool.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
