<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Defense Spending on k4i.com</title>
    <link>https://k4i.com/tags/defense-spending/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Defense Spending on k4i.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://k4i.com/tags/defense-spending/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Dark Eagle&#39;s Price Tag and the Congressional Oversight Problem</title>
      <link>https://k4i.com/dark-eagles-price-tag-and-the-congressional-oversight-problem/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://k4i.com/dark-eagles-price-tag-and-the-congressional-oversight-problem/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;At roughly $41 million per missile in 2023 dollars — and reportedly higher for the first eight missiles requested in the FY2025 budget — the Dark Eagle sits at a price point that makes magazine depth a genuine strategic liability. A single battery holds eight rounds. The arithmetic is uncomfortable.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The Congressional Budget Office&amp;rsquo;s January 2023 study on U.S. hypersonic weapons placed the per-unit cost of intermediate-range boost-glide missiles comparable to the LRHW at that $41 million figure for a 300-missile buy. Army program officials confirmed in discussions with the Congressional Research Service that the actual fly-away cost for the initial FY2025 procurement would exceed that estimate. The standard procurement logic applies — costs should fall as production quantities rise — but the Army has not yet demonstrated that production scale is achievable at the pace operational demand would require.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
