<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Japan on k4i.com</title>
    <link>https://k4i.com/tags/japan/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Japan on k4i.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://k4i.com/tags/japan/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>How Japan Lost Semiconductor Leadership to Taiwan</title>
      <link>https://k4i.com/how-japan-lost-semiconductor-leadership-to-taiwan/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://k4i.com/how-japan-lost-semiconductor-leadership-to-taiwan/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Japan built the modern semiconductor industry. By the mid-1980s it held more than half of global DRAM market share and was the presumptive long-term dominant force in chip manufacturing. Within two decades that position had been absorbed almost entirely by Taiwan and South Korea. The transfer of leadership was not the result of a single competitive reversal. It was structural, compounding, and in several respects self-inflicted.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-1986-trade-agreement&#34;&gt;The 1986 Trade Agreement&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The proximate wound arrived through policy. The US-Japan Semiconductor Trade Agreement of 1986 set floor prices on Japanese chip exports and required that foreign companies reach a 20% share of the Japanese domestic market. Washington framed it as reciprocity. The practical effect was to hand American and Korean competitors a margin-protected breathing window at exactly the moment when fab investment requirements were beginning to escalate sharply. TSMC was founded the following year. The timing was not a coincidence — the agreement had altered the risk calculus for a pure-play foundry model that Japan had dismissed and the US had reason to encourage.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nikkei 225 Has Gained Nearly 7% in Four Sessions. Here Is Why.</title>
      <link>https://k4i.com/nikkei-225-has-gained-nearly-7-in-four-sessions.-here-is-why./</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://k4i.com/nikkei-225-has-gained-nearly-7-in-four-sessions.-here-is-why./</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Nikkei 225 closed at 64,142 on May 24, up roughly 7% from the level it held before May 21. Four sessions. The move was not random volatility — it was the convergence of three distinct catalysts arriving simultaneously on a market that had already been building one of the strongest year-to-date performances among major global benchmarks.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;may-21-the-session-that-started-it&#34;&gt;May 21: The Session That Started It&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;On May 21 the Nikkei surged 3.14%, its strongest single session in months. Three forces drove it. Nvidia&amp;rsquo;s earnings had confirmed that AI infrastructure demand was not decelerating, sending technology stocks higher across every market that touched the sector. Separately, progress in US-Iran peace negotiations shifted global risk sentiment in a direction that favored equity markets broadly. And SoftBank Group gained 19.85% in a single day, making it the dominant contributor to the index&amp;rsquo;s point advance by a wide margin. SoftBank is price-weighted in the Nikkei, which amplifies its directional influence relative to its market capitalization weight. The broader Topix gained approximately 1.6% on the same session, confirming the advance had breadth beyond the SoftBank effect.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
