<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Special Operations on k4i.com</title>
    <link>https://k4i.com/tags/special-operations/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Special Operations on k4i.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://k4i.com/tags/special-operations/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>U.S. Special Operations Has an OSINT Problem. Ukraine Showed the Cost.</title>
      <link>https://k4i.com/u.s.-special-operations-has-an-osint-problem.-ukraine-showed-the-cost./</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://k4i.com/u.s.-special-operations-has-an-osint-problem.-ukraine-showed-the-cost./</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Ukrainian conflict produced a body of evidence that U.S. Special Operations forces have been slow to absorb. When Ukrainian units began identifying Russian troop concentrations using commercial satellite imagery and geolocated social media faster than classified ISR channels could validate those locations, it demonstrated that the information advantage in modern conflict does not automatically accrue to the side with the largest classified collection budget. It accrues to the side that can act on available information fastest. OSINT is often that information, and U.S. SOF&amp;rsquo;s integration of it remains uneven.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
