<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Stocks on k4i.com</title>
    <link>https://k4i.com/tags/stocks/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Stocks on k4i.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://k4i.com/tags/stocks/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Micron, Sandisk, Marvell: Wall Street Stopped Pricing AI Memory and Interconnect as a Commodity Cycle</title>
      <link>https://k4i.com/micron-sandisk-marvell-wall-street-stopped-pricing-ai-memory-and-interconnect-as-a-commodity-cycle/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://k4i.com/micron-sandisk-marvell-wall-street-stopped-pricing-ai-memory-and-interconnect-as-a-commodity-cycle/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There is one argument running underneath every chip-stock target reset this week, and it is not really about chips. It is about whether memory, storage, and the wires between accelerators are commodity components that move on the old PC-and-mobile cycle, or mission-critical AI infrastructure whose demand scales with every model upgrade, every reasoning capability, and every agentic deployment.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Bank of America just answered that question with its wallet. On June 23 — a day the group was getting hit, not bid — Vivek Arya raised Micron to $1,500 from $950 and reframed DRAM and high-bandwidth memory as structural AI infrastructure rather than a cyclical good. The same desk lifted Marvell to $365 the same session and circulated a note arguing the broader memory-plus-interconnect complex represents another trillion-dollar opportunity for chip names. That is the tell. When one analyst makes the identical structural call across DRAM, NAND, and custom silicon on a down day, it is not a price target. It is a thesis.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quantinuum (QNT) Falls Below Its $60 IPO Price as Revenue Shrinks 73%</title>
      <link>https://k4i.com/quantinuum-qnt-falls-below-its-60-ipo-price-as-revenue-shrinks-73/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://k4i.com/quantinuum-qnt-falls-below-its-60-ipo-price-as-revenue-shrinks-73/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Quantinuum was sold as the quantum sector&amp;rsquo;s first real institutional listing: a full-stack platform, a Honeywell pedigree, a book that came in roughly twenty times oversubscribed, an offer walked up from a $45–$50 range to $53–$55 and finally priced at $60. Two sessions in, the stock is below its offer price. The debut did not break because quantum sentiment collapsed. It broke because the price embedded a decade of execution that the financials do not support. A $60 offer was a sentiment trade, and sentiment trades reprice fastest.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
