<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Technology Competition on k4i.com</title>
    <link>https://k4i.com/tags/technology-competition/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Technology Competition on k4i.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://k4i.com/tags/technology-competition/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>What China&#39;s 15th Five-Year Plan Means for the United States</title>
      <link>https://k4i.com/what-chinas-15th-five-year-plan-means-for-the-united-states/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://k4i.com/what-chinas-15th-five-year-plan-means-for-the-united-states/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;China&amp;rsquo;s 15th Five-Year Plan does not treat the United States as a partner, a model, or a neutral variable. It treats US trade and technology policy as an active constraint on Chinese development — one that requires deliberate countermeasures. The plan assesses that US policies are challenging the global trade order and constraining China&amp;rsquo;s economic prospects. That assessment drives the entire self-reliance agenda.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;For Washington, the plan presents a document-level confirmation of what US export control and investment screening policy has already assumed: that Chinese industrial policy and Chinese S&amp;amp;T development are inseparable from Chinese strategic competition with the United States, and that the civilian-military distinction that US regulation relies on does not reflect how the Chinese system actually works.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
