<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>XPU on k4i.com</title>
    <link>https://k4i.com/tags/xpu/</link>
    <description>Recent content in XPU on k4i.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://k4i.com/tags/xpu/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Marvell&#39;s Path to a $1 Trillion Market Cap: The Revenue, Margin, and Timeline Math Behind the MRVL Bull Case</title>
      <link>https://k4i.com/marvells-path-to-a-1-trillion-market-cap-the-revenue-margin-and-timeline-math-behind-the-mrvl-bull-case/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://k4i.com/marvells-path-to-a-1-trillion-market-cap-the-revenue-margin-and-timeline-math-behind-the-mrvl-bull-case/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When Jensen Huang stood on the Computex stage and called Marvell a potential trillion-dollar company, it sounded like a courtesy extended to a new partner. It is not. It is a forecast with a visible arithmetic spine. Marvell closed near $325 in mid-June carrying a market capitalization around $272 billion. A trillion dollars is roughly 3.7 times that. The question is not whether the path exists. It exists, it is mapped, and Marvell&amp;rsquo;s own guidance lays most of the mileposts. The question is how many years it takes and what has to hold along the way.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
